Opposition leader Dr. Kizza Besigye and political activist Hajji Obeid Lutale have refused to appear in court if their fresh bail application is handled by Judge Emmanuel Baguma. Both leaders, through their lawyers, expressed a lack of confidence in the judge, citing what they call “unfair treatment” in previous proceedings.
Their legal team stated clearly that unless a different judge is assigned, Besigye and Obeid will not proceed with the bail application. “Our clients believe that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done,” their lawyers explained. This shows that the opposition figures are determined to seek fairness in a legal system they believe has been biased against them.
The refusal has sparked discussions among legal experts, political analysts, and the public, with many watching closely to see how the judiciary will respond to this unusual move. Some observers note that this could set an important precedent in how high-profile political cases are handled in Uganda, especially when the fairness of a judge is publicly questioned.
Besigye, a former presidential candidate and long-time opposition figure, and Hajji Obeid, known for his political activism, have both been involved in legal battles that attract wide public attention. Their latest refusal adds another twist to their ongoing legal saga, highlighting tensions between opposition leaders and the judicial system.
The situation remains uncertain, and it is not yet clear whether the High Court will assign a new judge or insist that Judge Baguma preside over the case. Meanwhile, the story continues to generate debate about fairness, judicial independence, and the treatment of opposition figures in Uganda.
